Talk:China Lucky Film
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
References
[edit]I've just cleaned up the external links, making one a reference. The problem is that the Peoples' Daily link [1] is broken - it's transferred with a MIME type of text/plain. It is rendered as HTML in MSIE because it autodetects the HTML tags. But all other browsers follow the standards and display the HTML code as plain text. I've replaced the link with another at china.org.cn which appears to be the same content.
As well as the official (english) link, the two other links are both articles about the company. These would work better as references. --Imroy 21:53, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on China Lucky Film. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070203174345/http://www.chinatoday.com.cn/English/e2004/e200402/p22.htm to http://www.chinatoday.com.cn/English/e2004/e200402/p22.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061206233007/http://brandchannel.com/features_effect.asp?pf_id=85 to http://www.brandchannel.com/features_effect.asp?pf_id=85
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:45, 5 August 2017 (UTC)