Talk:China International Capital Corporation

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

China

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Companies Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Requested move 16 November 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: move as proposed. (non-admin closure) Bradv 23:29, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

China International Capital Corp → China International Capital Corporation – The company was well known as CICC, per MoS Corp. should not be used Matthew_hk t c 12:06, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). — Amakuru (talk) 12:11, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment it looks like most sources do call it "Corp",[1][2][3] and I'm not aware of the MOS rule mentioned. There might also be a case for simply calling it CICC. Best to discuss this I think. — Amakuru (talk) 12:11, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

the MoS i mentioned Wikipedia:NCCORP. The full name China International Capital Corporation Limited and abb. CICC was quite well known, just should it follow the MoS for

Legal status may be included, even when disambiguation is not needed, for companies that are commonly known by acronyms such as British Overseas Airways Corporation (BOAC). Do not abbreviate the legal status in these cases, unless the abbreviated form is preferred by the company in question.

Matthew_hk t c 12:20, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support. A minor matter but nom is quite right, and I was also unaware of this MOS clause. Good catch. Andrewa (talk) 20:27, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Advising on HNA acquisition of Ingram

Thinking more details would be a good thing, considering. Wikipietime (talk) 02:37, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]