Talk:Chime Communications Limited/Archives/2011
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Chime Communications Limited. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Requested move
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was moved to Chime Communications (United Kingdom), and Chime Communications made into a disambig. -Patstuarttalk|edits 18:46, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
Chime Communications PLC → Chime Communications — This company is based in the United Kingdom. The PLC at the end of the name shouldn't be part of the article title. I don't know whether the article name Chime Communications should be used for this company based in the United Kingdom (with a separate disambiguation page to be called Chime Communications (disambiguation)) or whether Chime Communications should be used for a new disambiguation page (and so the company based in the United Kingdom would move to Chime Communications (England) or Chime Communications (United Kingdom). The article for an unrelated Australian company with a similar name is at Chime Communications (Australia). Chime Communications currently is a redirect to Chime Communications (Australia) —Eastmain 00:47, 3 January 2007 (UTC) Eastmain 02:57, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Survey
- Add # '''Support''' or # '''Oppose''' on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.
Survey - Support votes
Survey - Oppose votes
Discussion
- Add any additional comments:
- Move this to Chime Communications (United Kingdom) and turn Chime Communications into a disambig page. TJ Spyke 01:54, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- Agreed with TJ Spyke. Move to UK, redirect this page to Chime Communications, which itself becomes a disambig. -Patstuarttalk|edits 20:54, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you both for your comments. I have done as you suggested. --Eastmain 22:49, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.