Talk:Children of Gebelawi

Egypt Low‑importance

	Egypt portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egypt on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject EgyptTemplate:WikiProject EgyptEgypt articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Novels Mid‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has an incomplete infobox template! - see Novels InfoboxCode or Short Story InfoboxCode for a pattern.

Untitled

Children of Gebelawi

the protagonist of the book's fifth section (who, significantly, comes after the Prophet of Islam) symbolises modern science.

why significantly ?

because these disbelieving khanazeer consider science to disprove religion. Idiots.

Actually it would more be about the implication of a successor to Muhammad, despite the fact he proclaimed himself as the last of the prophets of God. But nice try with the insults.

God made Man; God made the Universe. Man informed his understanding of God's machinations under the term "science". Man knows very little yet of what God has done which it can know under the auspices of science, yet when it knows all it can in within those parameters, it will still know nothing in comparison to the knowledge of God. Its kind of like a toddler imagining that he builds whole cities when he links together lego blocks. We split an atom an think we can replace God. The child is naive; we are arrogant. Science does not come to replace God but rather God created all the phenomenon of the sciences so that, when we were advanced enough, we would have more opportunities to observer His majesty. It is our fault that we are fools and do not see God in science. Damned fools to see science above God. 70.114.231.223 01:10, 22 August 2006 (UTC

The article is talking about what the book implies, not what anyone thinks. --Maha Odeh (talk) 15:32, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]