Talk:Childhood immunizations in the United States

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Viruses Low‑importance

	Viruses portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Viruses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of viruses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirusesWikipedia:WikiProject VirusesTemplate:WikiProject Virusesvirus articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Daword95.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:58, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Page creation

Did this page for a school project. Feel free to add whatever you want, so long as it complies with wiki standards of course. Mitziferret (talk) 03:28, 11 April 2014 (UTC)Mitziferret[reply]

Anti-Vaccination

I think two separate issues have been conflated here. I can find no mention of Andrew Wakefield under Thiomersal controversy and vice-versa. I think MMR vaccine and thiomersal are two separate controversies. Biscuittin (talk) 20:48, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If thiomersal content were a problem then it would apply to all thiomersal-containing vaccines, not just the MMR vaccine. Biscuittin (talk) 20:56, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

More Information

American Academy of Pediatrics This is a link to a page refuting the claims in the original study done by Wakefield. The Lancet This is the original study done by Wakefield which you can see has been retracted.

The reason you probably think that these are two separate controversies is because the media doesn't report about the original findings that caused the anti-vaccination movement. It was originally Wakefield saying that the thimerosal in the MMR vaccine is what caused autism. This claim was later debunked and Wakefield's medical license was revoked. You were right in that the Thiomersal controversy page did not have any mention of Andrew Wakefield, I posted on the talk page asking them to fix it and added my links. The Andrew Wakefield page does not contain the word "Thimerosal", and I have posted this to that talk page as well.

The only vaccine that is still on the market that contains thimerosal is multidose vials of the flu shot, which is in this article "Thimerosal is used in these mutli-dose vials to prevent contamination from multiple preparations. Contamination of the vaccine could cause serious infection. In a .5mL dose (which is in a single flu shot), there is 25 µg (micrograms) of mercury. This is 0.01% of the dose.[40] Single dose vials do not contain thimerosal"

Mitziferret (talk) 16:20, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Evaluation of Childhood Vaccination Article

In the article Childhood Immunization in the United States various contributors examine the causes, effects and remedies used to solve various diseases the effect the population. While reading the article I was surprised by the lack of information provided for opposing arguments, which leads me to believe that the majority of contributors answered added information according to their bias. Moreover, the bias is not noted which means that the article is lacking in argument and geared toward audiences that agree with notion of children being vaccinated to prevent spread of disease in young children. Although the everything in the article is relevant is needs to include the opinion of naysayers and disprove their arguments against vaccinations in order to be used effectively in studies and valid viewpoints. Daword95 (talk) 03:43, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The opposing arguments are pseudoscientific nonsense and are not in line with reality. That is why they're not given the spotlight. TylerDurden8823 (talk) 03:02, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Childhood immunizations in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140105025757/http://www2.aap.org/immunization/families/autismwakefield.html to http://www2.aap.org/immunization/families/autismwakefield.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:08, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]