Talk:Childbirth positions

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's Health Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's Health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HealthTemplate:WikiProject Women's Healthwomen's health articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

There is next to no information on this page, and you cannot get to it through the wiki entry for childbirth. Needs revision.

I removed some uncited info.----occono (talk) 16:42, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Child birth

Can a woman give birth to baby without sex Avinash Mallik (talk) 05:56, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The word "Mother"

I went through this article to remove the word "mother" when found, replacing it with words like "pregnant person" or person. As not all people who give birth are mothers (including but not limited to trans men and people intending to give the child up for adoption), this language is inaccurate. Due to the existence of people who are not women who do give birth, I also changed uses of "she" (only, I believe, two of them) to "they". While these changes often did lead to an increased word count, they also improved accuracy. While they were reverted, I believe they should be reinstated.Hibou08 (talk) 22:40, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

First of all thank you for taking this to the talk page and your kind message on my talk page. I do not feel strongly about this as I don't most articles except I want to make Wikipedia the best resource it can be. That being said the sources all state women, mothers, etc. We normally go with what the sources state.--VViking_TalkEdits 13:21, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I would not be surprised if all of the sources currently used for this article use the word mother. However, that is a common misconception. Because the number of people who give birth and yet do not qualify as mothers is so small, sources can often get away with that language. I am linking to two research papers handling pregnant transgender men, the first one explicitly discusses the language that the pregnant trans people used, neither one uses the word 'mother.' Article 1: Transgender Men Who Experienced Pregnancy After Female-to-Male Gender Transitioning. Article 2: From erasure to opportunity: a qualitative study of the experiences of transgender men around pregnancy and recommendations for providers. I am also going to link to two websites, one from the Midwives Alliance of North America, and one from Doula Trainings International, where each organization explains why it is important to use gender-neutral language with pregnant people. Doula Trainings International, Midwives Alliance Hibou08 (talk) 20:25, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps ‘female’ would be best here? “Birthing person” is obscure and can lead to unintended confusion. 76.68.71.88 (talk) 01:00, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Childbirth positions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:00, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]