Talk:Chicken Wings (comic)

This article was nominated for deletion on 21 March 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Comics: Strips / Webcomics Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related work groups:
/
	This article is supported by Comic strips work group.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Webcomics.

Just set this page up today! Whew, I wasn't aware editing in Wikipedia was that much work! I tried to keep it all concise and neutral, but please correct it if you feel there's anything wrong. I am aware that the article still lacks some references and links. Feel free to add anything, and I'll be back for some more editing.

Fair use rationale for Image:Chickenwings1.jpg

Image:Chickenwings1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:13, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chickenwings Captained.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

The following images, used in this article, have been nominated for deletion:

File:Chickenwings Captained.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
File:Chickenwings Nubo.jpg has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
File:Chickenwings Chuck.jpg has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
File:Chickenwings Julio.jpg has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
File:Chickenwings Sally.jpg has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
File:Chickenwings Hans.jpg has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
File:Chickenwings Jason.jpg has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
File:Chickenwings Ray.jpg has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Chickenwings Captained.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 23:30, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dont delete this article

This article should not be speedily deleted, its a webcomic as xkcd that has its own space in wikipedia, just delete the merchadising link from the article — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.86.166.51 (talk) 01:45, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because . — 169.130.150.98 (talk) 16:47, 22 March 2012 (UTC) [reply]

Contested deletion
[edit]
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because it provides an insight into the fire side of aviation. I know literally hundreds of people who check this site during the summer. Especially firefighters families who lose contact with their loved ones while they are fighting wilderness fires----the pilots try to udate the families via this site.. 67.171.127.205 (talk) 17:47, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Contested deletion
[edit]
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because it is not just a web cartoon but has been published and has been printed in other areas. When I first heard about this cartoon, this was the first place I looked for information about it. — Bretwizer (talk) 23:28, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Contested deletion
[edit]
Existing in books and online, Chicken Wings is a valid source of aviation humour & information, linked to from many locations online. Chicken Wings has more followers & interest than many of the other items kept on Wikipedia. Falcon124 (Take that runway, and that, and that...) (talk) 12:30, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Contested deletion
[edit]
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because <it is in refernce to a comic strip. Wikipedia has articles on Beetle Bailey, Dagwood Bumstead, etc ... why wouldn't Chicken Wings be included? Very large following not just in the aviation industry, but in the military as well. Fantastic comic artwork, and from a chuckle to an outright LOL humor>. — 166.20.224.10 (talk) 14:09, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
External links modified
[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Chicken Wings (comic). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
Added archive https://archive.is/20120717071130/http://alabamaaviator.com/news.asp?record_no=22887 to http://alabamaaviator.com/news.asp?record_no=22887
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:54, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]