Talk:Chicken Soup with Barley
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Chicken Soup with Barley
[edit]Talk Page
[edit]The neutrality of this article is being disputed? By whom? This article is a shinig beacon of neutralness amidst the dark night of biasness, an oasis of fair thinking in the dusty desert full of the sands of one-sidedness, the golden egg of impartiality in the chicken farm of bigotry, the shiny 2p coin of justness in the dark dirty wallet of prejudice.
I don't think it is biased.
Links
[edit]- Thesaurus.com Stuck for words that mean biased? Try here.
HACK
[edit]This is a delibrate rip off of my work, especially the following:
Sarah; who is an adamant Socialist, is strong, family-minded, honest though bossy; Harry; who is Sarah’s husband, is weak, a liar, not at all manly and lacks conviction, Sarah’s antithesis if you will; Ada; is extremely passionate about what she believes in, Marxism, like the others, is also romantic both personally and politically; and finally Ronnie; youthful idealistic and just as romantic as Ada.
Who've commited this grave act of plagarism, has got to be the biggest, most unoriginal Bormannite ever. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pazuzu1990 (talk • contribs) 19:35, 21 February 2006.
- You posted that yourself. By doing so, you have licensed it under the GFDL. Did you read the notice on the edit page, saying "If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly or redistributed by others, do not submit it."? So stop complaining. You're most welcome to make serious contributions to this encyclopedia and help improving this article. You do seem to know quite a bit about Wesker and this play in particular, so it'd be great if you could improve it. But please remember that this is not your personal soapbox: the general tone of the stuff you had written earlier was way too dadaist, and moreover completely unsourced. You need to proviode sources. You might want to read WP:NPOV, WP:CITE, and Wikipedia:Verifiability. Lupo 07:37, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Chicken Soup with Barley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060114174307/http://www.arnoldwesker.com:80/synopses/chicken_soup.htm to http://www.arnoldwesker.com/synopses/chicken_soup.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060115100311/http://www.nottinghamplayhouse.co.uk:80/index.cfm/page/news.detail.cfm/navid/51/parentid/7/id/186 to http://www.nottinghamplayhouse.co.uk/index.cfm/page/news.detail.cfm/navid/51/parentid/7/id/186
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:09, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Article issues
[edit]- The title is ambiguous and likely should be at Chicken Soup with Barley (play). It currently appears it would be in the same category with specialties of soups. With mainly primary sources, including Arnold Wesker's home page, the notability is in doubt. Otr500 (talk) 23:39, 12 November 2019 (UTC)