Talk:Chicken Shack

Fair use rationale for Image:100tonchicken.png

Image:100tonchicken.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:43, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dates

Hm, the first sentence says the band was formed in the late '60s; the next paragraph says April 1965; and the infobox says 1967. At least one of these is faulty. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 06:44, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. I didn't write any of those dates, so I don't know why that flaw is present in the article. If I discover the correct formation year I will edit out the necessary infomation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SAULGNRFAN (talk • contribs) 10:39, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Member Timeline

The member timeline has not been completed, and if it was it would take up a huge amount of space due to the amount of musicians that have passed through the ranks of the band. I therefore propose it's removal from the page. As a result of this, I also propose that the former members should be placed back in the infobox. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SAULGNRFAN (talk • contribs) 21:21, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think the new member timeline which has been started on the page is a useful addition, and replaces the original member section well. However, until it is complete, I suggest that the previous member section remains untouched. SAULGNRFAN (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:12, 10 April 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Members section

Since the membership timeline was added to this page, the members section has been removed. I would think a simple members section would be useful on this page. Any objections? Burbridge92 (talk) 09:07, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chicken Shack. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080527223615/http://www.stanwebb.co.uk:80/ to http://www.stanwebb.co.uk/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]