Talk:Chichewa tones

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 4 October 2015 by reviewer Dodger67 (talk · contribs).

Languages

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Africa: Malawi / Mozambique / Zambia / Zimbabwe Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Malawi portal This article is supported by WikiProject Malawi.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Mozambique (assessed as Low-importance).
	Zambia portal This article is supported by WikiProject Zambia.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Zimbabwe.

Lead

Thanks for the deletions, a big improvement. I'll work on simplifying what's left. Kanjuzi (talk) 14:07, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Excessive detail

As for the general detail of the article, it's true, it goes into a lot of detail. Mind you, some of the existing linguistic articles, such as Germanic strong verb, or Swedish grammar, are also very detailed! Kanjuzi (talk) 14:07, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Footnotes

Explanatory notes and references are currently mixed together, I think they should be listed separately per WP:REFGROUP. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 09:49, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. I'll work on it. Kanjuzi (talk) 13:58, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Page viewing statistics

I am intrigued to see that while mostly about 5 to 10 people look at this article every day (who for all I know may be not people at all but search engines updating their databases), there is sometimes a spike of interest; for example from 28-30 December 2015 there were 141 views, and on 6-7 January 2016 115. Did some professor recommend it on their reading list? If so, was it useful and could the article be improved in any way? Or is there some other reason for the spike? Kanjuzi (talk) 03:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Revision of 15 March 2016

I can't quite see why the anonymous editor who deleted the opening paragraph did so. The brief introduction is necessary and without it the second paragraph makes no sense. Perhaps the editor deleted it in error. At any rate, I have restored it. Kanjuzi (talk) 18:00, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chichewa tones. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:30, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chichewa tones. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:29, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]