Talk:Chicago (typeface)

Typography Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Typography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Typography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TypographyWikipedia:WikiProject TypographyTemplate:WikiProject TypographyTypography articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Apple Inc.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apple Inc., a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Apple, Mac, iOS and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Apple Inc.Wikipedia:WikiProject Apple Inc.Template:WikiProject Apple Inc.Apple Inc. articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Info Box Content on Designer & Foundry

So, as of 26 August 2015, the info box says the following:

Designer(s): Susan Kare
Foundry: Bigelow & Holmes

Unfortunately, this kind of blurs things awkwardly. Really, it was originally Susan Kare (designer) under Apple Computer Inc. (foundry in this case), then later, Charles Bigelow and Kris Holmes (designers) redid it under their foundry (Bigelow & Holmes) which was commissioned by Apple for the TrueType remake of Chicago. This distinction is blurred in the info box, lending to potentially false conclusions. Notably, Susan Kare was not a designer working under Bigelow & Holmes. Susan Kare worked for Apple. Charles Bigelow and Kris Holmes worked for themselves under the foundry name of Bigelow & Holmes.

One possible fix is to do something similar to the following:

Designer(s): Susan Kare (1984), Charles Bigelow & Kris Holmes (1991)
Foundry: Apple Computer (1984), Bigelow & Holmes (1991)

Note that the release years are used and not the years for main creation, since Susan Kare had worked on Chicago proper during sometime before the January 1984 release (she joined Apple in 1982, and the Macintosh project started earlier than that, so sometime between 1982–1983 would be Chicago's development) and Charles Bigelow & Kris Holmes started the "Apple 4 Fonts project" in 1988, but the font was released accompanying System 7 in 1991.

—BrianKrent (talk) 01:15, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Name changed in OS X?

A side-by-side comparison of Chicago and a font called Krungthep (found in Leopard, was an upgrade from Tiger.) shows similarity. I don't know wether it is simply just a rename or if it is a different font.

--Onekopaka (talk) 22:42, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the tip. In the standard ASCII range it appears to be identical (AFAICT from screenshots) but additional searching online indicates it to be a Thai font. It could be Chicago extended with Thai characters. ⇔ ChristTrekker 16:05, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, many of the non-Roman fonts include Roman characters similar or identical to one of Apple's standard fonts, since most applications assume that Roman characters will always be available. David Arthur (talk) 19:48, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Chicago in System 6 UI-manipulated.png

Image:Chicago in System 6 UI-manipulated.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:22, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]