Talk:Chez Scheme

Computing: Software / Free and open-source software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as Low-importance).

That was not an article, that was an advertisement.

I corrected it a little - it just said "how great Chez Scheme was", but:

- the language was at least apt to suggest SEVERAL INDEPENDENT benchmarks, while in reality it was only ONE SINGLE SERIES of benchmarks, by some random guy on the internet with some subjective set of samples (why not mention THAT?); and even that was 5 years ago, maybe that should be mentioned too;

- it was not said who was actually FASTER than Chez and on which place of how many Chez was to be found;

- it was "forgotten" to mention that Chez came out fast on the totally esoteric "Sun Blade 1500", while Petite totally lost out on the very common x86-architecture.

Aeneas

If you want to include benchmarks

I don't know if this qualifies, but this looks like a legit benchmark to me. It is also relatively recent and on x86: https://ecraven.github.io/r7rs-benchmarks/

Andre