Talk:Chestnut-capped piha/GA1

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Starsandwhales (talk · contribs) 21:17, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'll be reviewing this article over the next few days/weeks. If you have any questions leave a message here or on my talk page and I'll respond as soon as I can :D starsandwhales (talk) 21:17, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

link "premontane"?

-Done as an IP Editor (different person, just helping)

"The species' discovery led to hopes that more undescribed species existed in this portion of Colombia; since then, newly described bird species from central Colombia include the Magdalena tapaculo, Stiles's tapaculo, Antioquia brushfinch, and Antioquia wren." --> the structure of this sentence is confusing. could you restructure it?

-Attempted to fix (different person, just helping)

"It may form a superspecies with the dusky, cinnamon-vented, and scimitar-winged pihas." --> according to whom? why is this of interest? why is it unconfirmed?
Duplicate links in the description section for the terms "secondaries" and "tertials"

-Done (different person, just helping)

Duplicate link for Cordillera Central Mountains

-Done (different person, just helping)

In the Conservation section, mention who is describing the species as endangered.

-Done 180.194.141.59 (talk) 05:03, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't necessary but do you have any more details on why the chestnut-capped piha was considered for the stamp?

-I believe I've added those details. 180.194.141.59 (talk) 05:29, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

180.194.141.59, you've added those details, but you haven't provided a source. You can't just go with what you think, even if you're right. There has to be a source! MeegsC (talk) 12:05, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I decided to delete it, there were no further information about the bird on a stamp.

It isn't necessary for GA, but could you add alt-text to your images? It greatly helps with accessibility.

-Done (different person, just helping.)

No edit wars or copyvio

Just letting you know that I will be a lot more busy over the next two weeks so I won't be able to respond to any messages that quickly. starsandwhales (talk) 21:16, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Idk how to ping User:Starsandwhales, but do you think some of my edits helped the problems? I tried to help but have no more info about the Piha being superspecies. 180.194.141.59 (talk) 05:32, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Starsandwhales and Pomatostomus: is this review still in progress? I notice User:Pomatostomus is inactive, but wouldn't like to see this GAN abandoned or linger here. Been about two months since last edit. Urve 08:54, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Review will not be completed

I have just pinged Starsandwhales on their talk page, and they will not be returning to this review. Accordingly, I will be returning the nomination to the pool of those awaiting a reviewer without any loss of seniority; the next review will take place on a different page from this one. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:35, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.