Talk:Chester station (Toronto)

Chester station (Toronto) was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 3, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed
September 22, 2020	Good article reassessment	Delisted

Current status: Delisted good article

Trains: Stations / Rapid transit Low‑importance

	Trains Portal
Sel	week 20, 2013

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit.

Canada: Ontario / Toronto Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Toronto (assessed as Low-importance).

Station location within former municipality

Someone has hit several articles indicating that the majority of the stations of the Danforth Ave. Stations were in both East York and Toronto (Former City). Please consult a map of the old city boundries before editing such content. the dividing line as indicated on several maps (such as this one: [1]) is clearly North of Danforth. This therefore means the station was ONLY located in the former city of Toronto. Eja2k (talk) 06:21, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Chester (TTC)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 22:11, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:
~~See comment section below.~~ Good.

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
~~See comment section below.~~ Good.

C. No original research:
~~See comment section below.~~ Good.
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
Pass!--Dom497 (talk) 00:57, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

"In keeping with the subway line's theme the trim tiles compliment Lansdowne station while the main tiles compliment Dufferin station", rather then just saying that the tiles used are similar to Lansdowne and Dufferin station, include the actually tile colours/design. The sentence can be something like this: "In keeping with the subway line's theme, the trim tiles are blue in compliment to Lansdowne station." The reason why I left the Dufferin part out is because according to the reference provided, Dufferin and Chester have to different main colour tiles. What what it looks like, Woodbine has the same main tile colour as Chester.
- Clarified to show that these are the compliment stations on the opposite (western) half of the subway line. Tarret ^talk 20:37, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"...is one of the least used subway stations in Toronto", ref 7 does not support this.
- Relocated reference to apply to "not connected to a regular bus or streetcar route". Secondarywaltz (talk) 15:18, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In the infobox, the total ridership of 2009-10 should have a reference.
- Lack of a reference is system wide so please leave this to me and I will fix it for every TTC station within the next 24 hours. Secondarywaltz (talk) 15:18, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Ridership is now referenced for all of the TTC subway stations. Secondarywaltz (talk) 17:56, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The the article will be on hold for 7 days to allow the suggestions above to be addressed.--Dom497 (talk) 22:29, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have passed the article.--Dom497 (talk) 00:57, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chester station (Toronto). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:59, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

En-Chester station (Toronto).ogg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:07, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

Chester station (Toronto)

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • GAN review not found

Result: Delisted: no improvements, more than a month since deficiencies in the GA criteria were identified. Please improve this article and bring back to GAN! (t · c) buidhe 18:31, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am bringing this article to GAR because:

The Communities served section is full of OR which has existed since the article became a GA. (2b)
There is a lack of lead coverage of parts of the article. (1b)
Another user mentioned that the article lacks clarity or assumes a local knowledge in some parts. (1a)

This is my first GAR, so I apologize if I made any mistakes here. There may also be some problems I have not mentioned (I think the Facilities section may have an unnecessary detail (3b) problem, but I'm not sure). Username⁶⁸⁹² 01:18, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Kingsif

I'll add comments when I see things. Something to consider is that this is a short article, and how does it compare to similar ones. Not every station in North America is going to have or warrant the level of coverage of Grand Central Terminal, but it's currently comparable size-wise with the English Moncloa (Madrid Metro) article, something you'd expect to have far less. Without being an expert, I would do some research on the Chester station myself to see if the level of coverage reflected media coverage (and will do if nobody beats me to it!) Kingsif (talk) 01:58, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Epicgenius

Here are some things I noticed.

The lead is too short. (criterion 1B)
The lead is also disorganized. For instance, the fact that WiFi is available here comes before the fact that this station has one exit. (3A)
The "facilities" section probably needs to be more detailed, e.g. describe how many tracks and platforms are in the station. That's pretty important info, yet the only mention of this is in the infobox, where it is not sourced. (3A)
And the description of the tiles may be too detailed. (3B)
It's optional, but I think the exits may be combined under one header.
The "communities served" section is not really detailed. As an outsider I wouldn't know where these communities are. Some context may be needed for this. (3A)
This is the only station in Toronto with no TTC bus service during the day. - This seems to be trivia, particularly the first part. epicgenius (talk) 02:46, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]