Talk:Chenggong, Kunming

China: Cities Mid‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Chinese cities workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).

I do believe the claim on the main article of having a million or so people is wrong. There is no reference so I'm replacing it with one. [1] Mathmo ^Talk 10:47, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

oops, meant to place this at one layer deeper.... Ordos City Mathmo ^Talk 10:51, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chenggong District. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://travel.nytimes.com/travel/guides/asia/china/yunnan-province/kunming/41858/dounan-flower-market/attraction-detail.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071107025021/http://www.cpi.com.cn/cpi-eng/code/yunnan.asp to http://www.cpi.com.cn/cpi-eng/code/yunnan.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:55, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]