Talk:Chen Sheng

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

China Mid‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Biography / Asian / Chinese

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	Asian military history task force
	Chinese military history task force

NPOV in Legacy section

Just after the indented quote in the Legacy section, in the paragraph beginning with "While Chinese historians may quibble...", I have identified two interrelated issues relating to Wikipedia's neutral point of view (NPOV) policies.

The two statements in question are "...it appears to be quite correct" and "he should not be viewed as a hero". These statements are clearly matters of opinion, but they are presented in this section as if they are empirical facts. If these statements are to remain in some form, the positions must be attributed to a relevant source or sources (this paragraph contains no citations at all, as has been flagged by myself and by another previous editor).

Bookmarx (talk) 07:54, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]