Talk:Chemical peel
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Copyright violation
[edit]Irongargoyle Thanks for looking into this so quickly but
This is my article from our site www.sleepingswan.com/ I did some research on this http://www.skinsite.com/ in the web archives the page did not exist when we had this article up, actually they copied our content, http://web.archive.org/web/20050203033033/www.sleepingswan.com/articles/Chemical_Peel_Information.htm This is dated 2005 Same date for the www.skinsite.com http://web.archive.org/web/20050217073805/www.skinsite.com/error_docs/not_found.html
http://web.archive.org/web/20050216093004/www.skinsite.com/ How you see is the site is in another launage but I went to the recent version and used it as a guide to find the page the content is suppose to be on. it isn't there. The page did not exist on this site at that time. This is proof we are not copyrighting it from this site.
We pulled this information from our website www.sleepingswan.com/
http://www.sleepingswan.com/articles/Chemical_Peel_Information.htm
Please take another look at Chemical peel. I feel you will see this is my work and not taken from another source
Thanks for your time in this matter and dedication to keeping Wikipedia a grat place for information. Supplements
I have rewritten another chemical peel article to keep any copyright issues from arising. thanks Supplements
- I have provided additional clean-up. — Reinyday, 21:38, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Jessner's solution redirects to this article. What is it?