Talk:Checkmate (1911 film)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: The Almightey Drill (talk · contribs) 07:14, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
I will review this. '''tAD''' (talk) 07:14, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
- It is well-written. Minor copy-edit done, nothing incredibly serious
- It is verified. The plot has sources because the film is lost. Nothing is outlandish and claimed without source, nor is there original research. Analysis is taken from a historian
- It is broad in its coverage inasmuch as can be for a lost film. These articles do not to be long, only fitting into criteria. The quality and scope of the article is not dissimilar to How Brown Saw the Baseball Game, a Featured Article
- No hard bias comes out from this article, it admits to the spectrum of views by contemporary critics. It would be ideal to include opponents of the Lonergan authorship hypothesis, but I admit that it is a) very likely he wrote it and b) there are few notable scholars on such a subject
- Stability is no problem
- Images are relevant, as are their captions. Both are public domain from being over a century old. I added an image of the only known credited person, which I believe to be entirely relevant to our imagination of a lost film.
As you can see, we have a pass '''tAD''' (talk) 07:36, 3 September 2015 (UTC)