Talk:Check (Meek Mill song)

Check (Meek Mill song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 27, 2023	Good article nominee	Listed

Electronic music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hip hop Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Check (Meek Mill song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zmbro (talk · contribs) 00:49, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Grabbing. – zmbro _{(talk) (cont)} 00:49, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Comments:

Could we shorten "Encore, Los Angeles, CA" to "Encore (Los Angeles)"?

Comment: this is how it is stylized in the liner notes so can't it remain? --K. Peake 08:54, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Throughout the video" → "In the video"?
"American record producers Metro Boomin and Southside handled the song's production, while they also co-wrote it with Mill." since this is the start of the body, how about ""Check" was produced by American record producers Metro Boomin and Southside, who co-wrote it with Meek Mill"? with links of course
"Young Thug's 2014 track "Hundreds (I Had A Dream)", which features Mill" → "Young Thug's Mill-featuring track "Hundreds (I Had A Dream)" (2014)"

Done for the above --K. Peake 08:54, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Were these "series of tweets" of note?

Not done they are lyrics, even from the song. --K. Peake 08:54, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You can remove the 2015 from "On June 29, 2015,"
"Def Pen" does not strike me as reliable. It honestly looks WP:SELFPUBLISHED
Minor but wasn't Consequence still Consequence of Sound in 2015?

Done for the above --K. Peake 08:54, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Sweeney said the song consists of "three synth notes and a huge beat"" this reads more like an actual description and not a reaction to it. I'd ditch it here or move it up to comp.

Partly done I remove the three synth notes from reception but kept huge beat, as that sounds like a review term. --K. Peake 08:54, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Kevin Goddard depicted that Mill" don't think "depicted" is the right word here
"and opined that it "should probably have opened the LP"" we can paraphrase this
Do we know who directed the video during the initial shoot? Was it Jordan or was he brought in to finish it? I'd clarify this

Done for the above --K. Peake 08:54, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is the Young M.A. freestyle notable?

Yes, as there is significant coverage. --K. Peake 08:54, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I ran the bot to archive all the URLs but it looks like it missed ref 3

Done --K. Peake 08:54, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's all I got. It's been cool reviewing someone other Kanye xP. Should be a GA in no time. – zmbro _{(talk) (cont)} 20:47, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Zmbro It has been fun working on articles for someone other than Kanye West too; this has now had the fixes implemented if you are ready to pass or not? --K. Peake 08:54, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Pass easy peasy – zmbro _{(talk) (cont)} 13:09, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]