Talk:Chebychev–Grübler–Kutzbach criterion
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Revisions to this article
[edit]I wrote the section on mobility for the article linkage (mechanical) before I saw this article. I copied that section here and revised the wording. I believe this is better than what was here previously, though it may be somewhat duplicative. Prof McCarthy (talk) 16:28, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
Notational crudities
[edit]I found this:
- M=6(N-1)
I changed it to this:
- M = 6(N − 1)
- The digits 6 and 1 and the parentheses should not be italicized. One does not indiscriminately italicize everything in non-TeX mathematical notation. One italicizes variables.
- And the minus sign is not a stubby little hyphen.
- And proper spacing is called for.
Of course the idea is to match TeX style as closely as possible.
See WP:MOSMATH Michael Hardy (talk) 04:18, 29 January 2019 (UTC)