Talk:Chau Say Tevoda/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 04:52, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I will be reviewing this. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 04:52, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

General

• No copyvio/external link trouble
• Dablink: Nagas
  • Done
• Use italics for non-English terms
  • Done wherever required. Wikilinked names are not given in italics

Lead

• pre – dates the former and post – dates Use hyphens not spaced endashes
  • Done
• mid – 12th century hyphen not spaced endash
  • Done
• 2000 – 2009 Unspaced endash not spaced endash (also in History)
  • Done

History

• built in the 12th century In the lead you said "mid-12th"
  • Chnaged
• Further supplementation of structures were done "was", not "were"
• Yes, done

Features

• Many of the sculptures are in a fairly good condition and are of Vishnu Change to "Many of the sculptures depict Vishnu, and are in a fairly good condition"
  • Better wording. Done
• Nature has contributed to further deterioration resulting from the collapse of the ceiling Not sure what it means. If I am right this should be rephrased to "With time the ceiling has collapsed and led to further deterioration"
  • Replaced as suggested
• The Chau Say Tevoda was in a dilapidated state Simply say "The temple was...."
  • Done

• Thanks for the review. I have addressed all review comments. Please see if I need to address any more issues. Nvvchar. 05:58, 29 June 2016 (UTC)