Talk:Chatter mark

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Geology Low‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Chatter mark is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Glaciers

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Glaciers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Glaciers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GlaciersWikipedia:WikiProject GlaciersTemplate:WikiProject GlaciersGlacier articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Would it be appropriate to highlight the type of sedimentry rock that could develope chatter marks? I think I'm going to include information of where their most commonly found. Jack Rumsey (talk) 17:08, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Chatter marks in machine tools

Geology is not the only field using this term. Since it's only a stub I've just added the machine tool definitions. If there is more to say on one or the other we might have to split the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.236.26.74 (talk) 14:41, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If someone could let me know why my two posts got taken off it would be helpful to my understanding of wikipedia.Jack Rumsey (talk) 16:15, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your additions to Chatter mark were removed by an automatic bot which believed the additions to be vandalism. Bots can get things wrong so if you look at the history of the article you can report the error by clicking on the Report it tag. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 16:59, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've just added a three facts on the basic types of chatter marks. You guys may know more than me, but I don't believe splitting the artical is neccesary. Also, I'm not sure how. Jack Rumsey (talk) 16:27, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Add photos

We all know that geologists are retarded and lazy! No need to prove it once more! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:587:4108:2400:94F0:7A8B:A61A:DDA0 (talk) 06:00, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]