Talk:Chart of accounts

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Chart of accounts article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Business: Accounting

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Accounting task force.

Untitled

differences between the chart of account for limited company and the chart of account for a sole trader

The section of Nomenclature and classification is added based on the following....

--222.67.216.199 (talk) 02:20, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

--222.67.216.199 (talk) 02:24, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

--222.67.216.199 (talk) 02:26, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?hl=en&q=allintitle%3A+financial+classification&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0

--222.67.216.199 (talk) 02:37, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Red links maybe associated with the following

http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?as_q=financial+taxonomy&num=10&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=title&as_sauthors=&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_sdt=1.&as_sdtp=on&as_sdts=5&hl=en

--222.67.216.199 (talk) 03:03, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Codification

--222.67.216.199 (talk) 03:15, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Info about chart of accounts

http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?hl=en&q=allintitle%3A+chart+of+accounts&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0

--222.67.216.199 (talk) 02:31, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Are they neat or messy....???

http://www.iso.org/iso/search.htm?qt=financial&searchSubmit=Search&sort=rel&type=simple&published=on

--222.67.216.199 (talk) 03:11, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison of search results for different disciplines....

--222.67.216.199 (talk) 03:20, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.google.com.hk/search?hl=en&safe=strict&q=allintitle%3A+transportation+nomenclature&btnG=Search&meta=&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=

--222.67.216.199 (talk) 03:22, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.google.com.hk/search?hl=en&safe=strict&q=allintitle%3A+botanic+nomenclature&btnG=Search&meta=&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=

--222.67.216.199 (talk) 03:25, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Types of Accounts- adjunct

If we have contra-account, should we also have adjunct account? Isn't this for, say, a premium on a bond payable that increases the carrying value? That is to say, the opposite of a contra account. 68.45.156.4 (talk) 21:05, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chart of accounts. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150402152501/http://www.alcides-mp.com/?p=370 to http://www.alcides-mp.com/?p=370

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:51, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]