Jump to content

Talk:Charlie Hodes

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Charlie Hodes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:20, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Charlie Hodes/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 14:53, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Will review this article MWright96 (talk) 14:53, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Lede

[edit]
  • Mention Hodes' nationality in the first sentence of the lede

Early life

[edit]

Amateur career

[edit]
  • "and was still with them the following season" - remained with the team

Chicago White Stockings (1871)

[edit]
  • "as Philadelphia prevailed by a score of 4–1. [8]" - the space inbetween the period and the reference is not needed
  • "the White Stockings remained in contention for the league title until the final day of the season (October 30)," - the parentheses aren't really needed
  • Wikilink the term at bat for non-Baseball readers
  • "as Philadelphia prevailed by a score of 4–1." - more formal and concise; won 4–1

Troy Haymakers (1872)

[edit]
  • "Troy's season came to an abrupt end on July 23," - more formal; ended early
  • "The catcher had less playing time this year, only appearing in 13 of the team's 25 games, but he continued to demonstrate his versatility by playing third base, shortstop, and outfield again." - repetition of "playing"
  • "when the team's owners revealed that they would not be able to pay the players." - any reasons given?

Brooklyn Atlantics (1874)

[edit]
  • "He returned to Brooklyn and played semipro baseball until 1874," - semi-professional
  • Wikilink second base to the appropriate article for non-Baseball readers
  • "decided his player needed rest and gave him the remainder of the season off." - clarify this was Hodes that is being talked about

Illness and death

[edit]
  • "November 12 to raise funds for the player's recovery, and a benefit "hop" was held for him later that day," - try avoid using the term "the player's"

Reference

[edit]
  • Be consistent in how the date formats are presented. For example, most references are written as March 30, 2021 while Refs 3, 4 and 9 are written as 2009-01-12 etc.

Will put the review on hold to allow the nominator to address or query the points raised above MWright96 (talk) 19:02, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]