Jump to content

Talk:Charles Ollivierre/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sahara4u (talk · contribs) 05:38, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lede

[edit]
  • How did he represented the West Indies cricket team before they gained there Test status? You may link it to country.
  • "...becoming the first black West Indian to play for an English county." white West Indians had... played county cricket earlier?
  • Yes, although it is all quite odd. Pelham Warner, for instance, was technically a West Indian cricketer, and his brother captained the West Indies team. Also, other white West Indians played around this time in England, and one qualified for county cricket after the 1906 tour. Sarastro1 (talk) 15:11, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Early life and career

[edit]
  • ...went on to represent West Indies in first-class cricket. → "the" before west Indies
  • In other cricket, ... → What does this means?

West Indian tour of England in 1900

[edit]
  • ...several black cricketers on the team;... → in the team?
  • His highest score, and only century, ... → his only century in FC or in the series?

Derbyshire cricketer

[edit]
  • Against Essex, he made the highest score of his career,[5] when, according to his obituary in Wisden, "he was the dominating figure in a remarkable match". → Against Essex, he made the highest score of his career,[5] and according to his obituary in Wisden, "he was the dominating figure in a remarkable match".
  • "Essex scored 597 ......... 321 runs in the match." needs inline ref.

Good work with the article. Zia Khan 05:38, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Final review

[edit]
GA review (see Wikipedia:Good article criteria and WP:GACN)
  1. Well written.
    a (clear and concise prose which doesn't violate copyright laws, grammar and spelling are correct): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, and fiction:
  2. Factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (well-referenced): b (citations to reliable sources): c (Wikipedia:No original research):
  3. Broad in its coverage.
    a (covers major aspects): b (well-focused):
  4. Neutral .
    Fair representation, no bias:
  5. Stable.
    No edit wars nor disputed contents:
  6. Illustrated appropriately by images.
    a b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Result: No more issues, I guess. Good work, keep it up! Zia Khan 04:29, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    Pass/Fail: