Talk:Charles McMillen (architect)

United States: North Carolina Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	North Carolina portal This article is supported by WikiProject North Carolina (assessed as Low-importance).

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... he is a notable architect, new article supported by source in first edit of article. --do ncr am 02:43, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I concur on doncram's assessment.--Pubdog (talk) 21:48, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

development on "big fish" and other

Hi others, am glad to see contributions developing this article. I don't feel strongly about it, but I think sections aren't helpful in a short article, so removed them, wouldn't mind seeing them come back if others feel strongly. Also I note removal of characterization of McMillen as a "big fish in a small pond"... I had written that McMillen

was an American architect who became "a leading architect" of Wilmington, North Carolina, designing numerous large buildings in the city. He had skill to design major buildings in Richardsonian Romanesque architecture and other styles and, in prosperous Wilmington, was "something of a 'big frog in a little pond.'"

I think that characterization was helpful. The current article just says he was notable in Duluth and in Wilmington. I think the NCarchitects source explaining that he was one of many capable architects in Duluth, i.e. nothing special, vs. that he was something special and welcomed and valued in Wilmington, is very useful to note and share to readers. Is there objection to this in principle or is there objection just to the wording, of covering this? --do ncr am 15:34, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]