Talk:Charles Krafft

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

United States: Washington / Seattle Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington - Seattle (assessed as Low-importance).

Kenneth Howard

Is this sentence accurate? =//= Johnny Squeaky 22:17, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Holocaust denial controversy

Hi everybody. Is it my poor English or is it POV? What it says in the article is this: ... This led to a great deal of controversy in the art world, in which Krafft's occasional use of the swastika, and imagery related to the Second World War, had always been perceived as "darkly ironic." Some, such as Adam Parfrey of Feral House, came to his defense, while The Globe and Mail claimed that Krafft's personal beliefs should not be allowed to affect perceptions of his art. Where is the while? Ajnem (talk) 08:16, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Charles Wing Krafft. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101202104423/http://www.salon.com/people/feature/2002/05/30/krafft_profile/print.html to http://www.salon.com/people/feature/2002/05/30/krafft_profile/print.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:45, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have added four references to the article. The Vice Magazine Article has photos of the Hitler and the Charles Manson art works, but when the Archive Today Captured the URL the photo of the Manson art work came up blank. A more recent capture shows all of the photos of the arts works have been blocked. It would be useful if someone with digital right to some of the artworks would like to contribute photos to the wiki media commons in case the Vice Article is later removed from the internet. I myself took a photo of one of the Hitler Tea Pot that I saw at DeYoung Museum, but I don't know if I have the right to contribute the photo. There are a number of different makes and models of the Hitler Tea Pot one has blank eyes and one says "Famous Potatoes" for Idaho but I don't have photos and links to show them. Charles Krafft has a website which can be searched for and shows a number of different artworks created by him known as disaster ware. Ty78ejui (talk) 18:08, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]