Talk:Charles George Baker/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Midnightblueowl (talk · contribs) 19:26, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
I'll give this one a review. Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:26, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
I'm afraid that this going to be a fail at this time, for it does not quite meet the GA criteria. The following points are of particular concern:
- Large sections of the article are quoted directly from primary sources. This is not accepted at Wikipedia. Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:31, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
- Much of the article lacks citations, and thus might constitute Original Research. Remember that every claim made in the main body of the article must be supported by a citation. Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:31, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
Again, sorry to be the bearer of bad news but I hope that these tips will help you improve the article in future. Best, Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:31, 5 August 2016 (UTC)