Talk:Charles Beseler Company

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Films?

Is Draft:Beseler Educational Film Company related? FloridaArmy (talk) 23:02, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

contesting the speedy deletion

ZhongHan added a csd on the original, mistitled version of this article, so to be fair to wikipedia policy, I copied the csd to this article, and now want to contest the csd on this talk page. First of all, this article is not intended as spam to advertise the company as it does not have a large web presence nor electronic activity and neither it nor its competitors will likely be either positively or negatively affected by a wikipedia article on it. Second, I believe the Charles Beseler Company is notable for the following reasons: 1) it has existed for 10+ years (likely much longer, but this is to verify), and 2) it is involved in multiple industrial domains including the soon-to-be historic activity of silver halide photography. The company is likely to become an important part of history itself, as it furnished at least Ontario, Canadian schools with equipment that is now becoming obsolete. It is important to document the history of such photographic equipment and its producers.martin (talk) 08:34, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to add that I intend to back up these claims and I do think I can soon find references to do so.martin (talk) 08:35, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've now backed up most of the above claims. I hope that this is starting to make the notability of the subject less questionable. martin (talk) 17:38, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Charles Beseler Company. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080828002734/http://www.acecam.com/photography/4716.html to http://www.acecam.com/photography/4716.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:56, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]