Talk:Charing Cross roof collapse

Trains: Stations / in UK / in London Low‑importance

	Trains Portal

	London Transport Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject London Transport (assessed as Low-importance).

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph of the collapsed structure be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in London may be able to help!

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Relevance

Does this really deserve its own article? Perhaps it should just be mentioned at the Charing Cross article. J Milburn 04:11, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As soon as I saw this article, I thought the same thing. Looking on the Charing Cross railway station article, most of the info is already included. Nobody else seems to have had any opinion on this! KlickingKarl (talk) 12:21, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's just someone set up articles for everything in List of rail accidents in the United Kingdom no matter how much reference material is available. On the other hand, this article could be expanded somewhat - it made it into the New York Times (PDF) for instance. So I'd say it's not a no-brainer merger, I'd be open to keeping it if people can find enough detail on the collapse, but I'll tag it anyway to try and get more views. Le Deluge (talk) 23:12, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]