Talk:Chard, Somerset/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 09:34, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, here we go. I'll jot queries below. Casliber (talk · contribs) 09:34, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

~~A 1663 will by Richard Harvey of Exeter established Almshouses known as Harvey's Hospital.~~ ~~- plural --> singular?~~

I think the plural almshouses is correct as they were individual dwellings for the poor/distressed, when combined into one "hospital" (different meaning to current hospital) they became a single institution. The ref from English Heritage says "Harvey's Hospital (Almshouses)", therefore I think the current construction is correct.

gorse, bracken or broom. - I'd link these.

Done

It is also part of the Yeovil county constituency .... - shouldn't start a paragraph with an 'It' - is 'Chard' due to go here?

Done

~~...and support study of palaeontology in Britain~~ ~~- I don't get this bit~~

I've changed this to "making it a key locality for the study of palaeontology in Britain" which comes directly from ref 22

~~Any indication of the geological age of the chalk beds?~~

I've added "which was laid down in the Middle Cenomanian era between 99.6 ± 0.9 MA and 93.5 ± 0.8 MA (million years ago)". Imprecise I know but wp doesn't have an article for the Turrilites acutus Zone which might define it more closely.

~~The town's public transport links to Taunton are now provided by First Somerset & Avon (bus route 30)[34] and Stagecoach Southwest (bus route 99).~~ ~~- some indication of frequency might be good. Are they hourly? weekly? Also serves to buff the single sentence para that doesn't neatly fit anywhere else.~~

I've added that both services are hourly during weekdays.

~~The Church of St Mary the Virgin dates...~~ ~~- be good to mention denomination~~

Anglican added

Otherwise looks pretty good to go..Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:20, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comments, and your edits which have helped to improve the article. I hope the issues raised above have all been addressed?— Rod ^talk 09:11, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

1. Well written?:

Prose quality:

Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:

References to sources:

Citations to reliable sources, where required:

No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:

Major aspects:

Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:

Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?

No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:

Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

Overall:

Pass or Fail:

i.e. Good to Go. Casliber (talk · contribs)