Talk:Chaplain of the United States House of Representatives

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

U.S. Congress Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) person(s).

Untitled

Isn't Chaplain of the United States House of Representatives the official title? The current title is awkward and looks wrong. Paul 17:55, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chaplain of the United States House of Representatives. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://legacy.c-span.org/guide/congress/glossary/proforse.htm
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://legacy.c-span.org/questions/weekly21.asp
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110629103423/http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/resources/pdf/Chaplain.pdf to http://senate.gov/artandhistory/history/resources/pdf/Chaplain.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:03, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Use of 'median year'

What is the logic behind using 'median year' as the main descriptor in the table with denominations? The information was added in 2013 by an anonymous contributor without explanation. First of all, it is unclear from the text what method is used to determine the median (are we using years of service or appointments or people appointed?) but more importantly it is unclear what the meaning is that should be taken from this piece of information. Sure, it's a fun fact perhaps - but what does a 'low median' mean? Given that there are a lot of short appointments in the 19th century, depending on the method of calculating, a popularity in this timeframe would strongly influence the 'median year'. More relevant information might be the 'most recent appointment' for that denomination, and maybe the 'first appointment'. For now, I will be bold and replace median year with most recent appointment, but if there's serious disagreement, please feel free to edit/respond. effeietsanders 20:58, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]