Talk:Chapbook

[Untitled]

Someone more familiar than me with the current usage of chapbooks (like those published by various conventions and whatnot) needs to add information on this current usage. --nihon 07:07, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The Chap Book

Shouldn't there be some reference to The Chap Book, the US magazine published between 1894 and 1898?

Another point of interest would be to clarify when the phrase chap book was actually coined. --Azurfrog (talk) 19:38, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If the magazine is notable, it needs a page of its own. The usage could be chased up in the "Oxford English Dictionary". Charles Matthews (talk) 20:14, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction

This introductory paragraph needs to be rewritten—at present, it does not contain a short, straightforward description of what a chapbook is. Instead, it identifies it as "an early type of popular literature printed in Early Modern Europe", and then gives a brief (and well-written) discussion of the history and subject matter of chapbooks. This is all well and good, but what's missing is an answer to the question, "What is a chapbook?" That's the question that brought me to this article, and it remains unanswered.

Yes, it's an early type of popular literature, but surely there were many types of popular literature. Only one type was called a chapbook; which type was it?

Put another way, if I were looking at a shelf full of 17th-century European printed books in an antique book shop, how would I determine which ones were chapbooks? The first paragraph, and ideally the first sentence, needs to answer that question. Chalkieperfect (talk) 01:46, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have the same complaint -- I will try to take a stab at it now...-71.174.183.177 (talk) 19:42, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Novel article: Chapbook section

The section on the 'Chapbook' in the novel article is too long. [1] Can material from it be used here? Rwood128 (talk) 12:11, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Chapbook. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:29, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chapbook. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060113080859/http://www.loc.gov/rr/jrfell/2005-proj.html to http://www.loc.gov/rr/jrfell/2005-proj.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:32, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]