Talk:Chaocipher

Cryptography: Computer science Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cryptography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CryptographyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptographyTemplate:WikiProject CryptographyCryptography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computer science (assessed as Low-importance).

The article should clarify whether chaocipher is: (a) a *cipher* (which could be implemented in various ways, including but not limited to a physical machine), or (b) a *machine* whose internal construction must be kept secret. If it is (a), a modern cryptographer would still be interested in solving it. But if it is (b), no modern cryptographer would be interested in solving it: a fundamental requirement of modern cryptography is that the details of the cipher must be openly published for all to see. TC 58.174.242.29 15:04, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Confusion?

The article states At least three people know how it works: Byrne's son, and two of the editors of Cryptologia during 1990. Byrne, however, is now dead, so his secret is lost with him. If 3 people other than Byrne know how it works, how can the secret have died with him? Paste _{Let’s have a chat.} 22:16, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've deleted the sentence that claimed the secret is lost, as it contradicts a referenced source that says three people know it. Autarch (talk) 20:25, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So little info...

David Kahn mentions Byrne and his "chaocipher" in The Codebreakers [1], which is good enough for me to believe in its existence, but how strange that Googling is turning up so very little information aside from Wikipedia mirrors and blog "top ten lists" of ciphers. Does anyone have an actual sample of any of Byrne's challenge cipher texts? 151.197.226.214 (talk) 05:34, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Great minds think alike! To rectify the paucity of Chaocipher-related material on the Web I built a web site called "The Chaocipher Clearing House" [2]. You'll find there carefully edited ASCII versions of Byrne's challenge exhibits, chapter 21 from "Silent Years", a summary of Chaocipher research to date, references to articles, and my own research results. Moshe Rubin (talk) 09:53, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong information

The used link to "J. F. Byrne" is wrong! This is the wrong man!

The inventor of chaocipher "J. F. Byrne" was born in Dublin, 11. Feb. 1880 and died 1960 in USA. He was a friend of James Joyce. He wrote an autobiography called "Silent Years".

Please correct this. Best wishes.

Jürgen, —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.207.52.120 (talk) 16:29, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for spotting that; I've removed the link, as we don't currently have an article on the J. F. Byrne who developed the Chaocipher. — Gavia immer (talk) 17:13, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Strength / Weakness

How does it fare compared to other ciphers? How hard is it to break? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.139.81.0 (talk) 19:37, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Chaocipher. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:46, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

J. F. Byrne

I presume this is not the sportsman. Jackiespeel (talk) 09:10, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]