Talk:Chantecler (play)

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Theatre Low‑importance

	Theatre portal This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rock-A-Doodle

Is it worth noting that the Don Bluth animated film, Rock-A-Doodle, is based on this play? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.117.107.182 (talk) 18:19, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if there are reliable sources which have anything significant to say about the relationship between the play and the cartoon, yes. If it's simply a one-line piece of trivia, probably no. If there are no reliable sources at all, definitely no. Voceditenore (talk) 18:56, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"sophisticated Parisians": Opinion , or Source Needed?

"The play was not initially successful, partly because of the novelty of animal characters and the long delays (not all the fault of Rostand), but also to Guitry's uninspired performance, and because the sophisticated Parisians in the audience realised their way of life was being criticised."

First, the tone of this seems apologetic, which reads as unusual when compared to most Wikipedia entries. Second, the "sophisticated Parisians" seems entirely inappropriate as it suggests that the audiences who did enjoy it weren't "sophisticated" and it doesn't suffice as an explanation for the play's failure ("sophisticated" audiences should be able to both see the point of the play as well as its craft, and be able to weigh them appropriately) . In general, I'm not sure that determining why a particular play failed is either important or something that is usually so easily determined. Perhaps I'd go so far as to say that the plays whose successes are easily determinable are the only ones where it's worth noting. FallingOutsideTheNormalMoralConstraints (talk) 00:51, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

a boulevard actor unsuitable for the idealistic and poetic role intended for Coquelin"

Opinion, no source. As with the previous comment, it seems it would be better to remove some of the earlier passages and find some sources such as contemporary reviews 82.9.233.186 (talk) 23:37, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]