Talk:Channel Classics Records

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles

Record Labels

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Record Labels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of record labels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Record LabelsWikipedia:WikiProject Record LabelsTemplate:WikiProject Record Labelsrecord labels articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Feedback

Hi, a while ago I published my first article, and would like to get some feedback on it. As a music enthusiast, I started out writing an article about a small record label, which already has a Dutch version. I'm curious if the content and format are okay. I got feedback once and tried fixing the requested things. Does it look okay now?

Chasse Patate

Well, the feedback is right there at the top of the article, listing at least four things that could be improved, let me reiterate them:

Additional resources for verification. For example the entire first section about Sacks is unsourced.
Notability is not clear. You will need to show significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject
Very few or no other articles link to the article. You will need to go to other relevant articles and link the subject.
The article needed very heavy copy editing. I'm far from being an English expert (English is in fact my third language) and I could easily find quite a number of errors I corrected. I hope there aren't more.

I hope this helps. --Muhandes (talk) 18:22, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll go on fixing the problems you mention, it's still my first page but I want to make this one work as well as possible before starting other pages.

Chasse Patate — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chasse patate (talk • contribs) 10:27, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for all the help with this. I hope all flaws are solved now.

Chasse Patate — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chasse patate (talk • contribs) 08:05, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand why this article still needs additional citations for verification. I thought it was all clear. Can somebody provide me with some help?

Chasse Patate — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chasse patate (talk • contribs) 13:32, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Seems pretty well sourced now. Sorry I did not comment earlier, I think I was abroad when you made the last comment. --Muhandes (talk) 16:45, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Channel Classics Records. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110419192011/http://www.bfz.hu:80/diszkografia/bfz_diszkografia_en.php to http://www.bfz.hu/diszkografia/bfz_diszkografia_en.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:56, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]