Talk:Chandrashila

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian geography workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Mountains Low‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Altitude of Chandrashilla - 4200m?

Every travel agency tries to boost up the altitude of Chandrashilla and mentions it to be 4200m. The real height (snowless) is 3682m. Posting this here so that when overzealous editors edit it out, some can still correct it out. The climb is a mere 800m but yes the climb is steep and on a paved path which in my opinion is tougher than on natural mud paths. The one section that has a wee bit of exposure is after Tungnath as one needs to push ahead to the summit. (https://www.wikiloc.com/hiking-trails/tungnath-chandrashillatrek-5935911) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prashant maxsteel (talk • contribs) 19:55, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

I think trek route to Chandrashila is open throughout the year. Although Tungnath temple is closed, trekkers usually undertake this in winter as well as this is one of the very few treks(like Dodital Trek) possible in the winter months. Will be back with more details soon Frequent.me (talk) 22:17, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes you Right feel free to add the information ,but do mention about increase in arduousness during the winters/snowfall. User:AlokprasadPreceding undated comment added 03:11, 18 November 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Chandrashilla peak gets snowfall in winter months and there is plenty of soft snow beyond the Tungnath temple. The summer walk trails may not even exist and one needs to cut steps with the necessity of sidestepping. The whole round trek-able track is incorrect and must highlight snow walking conditions — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prashant maxsteel (talk • contribs) 10:24, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chandrashila. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090901105525/http://wildex.in:80/Chandrasilatop.htm to http://wildex.in/Chandrasilatop.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:22, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]