Talk:Chandelor v Lopus
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
The current text of this article implies that caveat emptor is some horrible abomination and stood in the way of the "right" approach, rather than simply another option for the standard assumptions in a commercial transaction. I am going to change to more neutral tone. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kevinpet (talk • contribs) 07:59, 7 February 2010 (UTC)