Talk:Chalice Well

Surely the holy grail caught Christ's blood at the crucifixion, not the last supper? Supposedly he GOT it at the last supper, but there's no blood at the last supper, so I'm going to change it Schnerf 21:04, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article does not include useful information such as who built the well, when, its original usage and significance and who and why connected it to the Grail. If anyone knows more about it, please add Pictureuploader (talk) 11:00, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chalice Well. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121012063432/http://www.imagesofengland.org.uk/Details/Default.aspx?id=265891 to http://www.imagesofengland.org.uk/details/default.aspx?id=265891

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:10, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How many imperial gallons?

This page says 250,000, but on Glastonbury it is only 25,000. Which is correct?--Nedergard (talk) 06:57, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Good question & "well" done for spotting the difference between the two articles. The figure does not appear to be supported by a citation in either article so I looked for "sources" (not always RS):

Telegraph Travel says "The capped spring flows out at 25,000 gallons a day and a steady 52F."
Bit about Britain says "the well produces 25,000 gallons (or 113,652 litres) each day"
Britain Express says "a flow of some 25,000 gallons of water each day"
Women of Grace says "a rate of 250,000 imperial gallons per day"
Mystical World Wide Web says "a rate of 25,000 (UK) gallons per day even in a drought"

So on balance I think 25,000 gallons is probably right (but not sure how many of these took their figures from wikipedia).— Rod ^talk 15:59, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]