Talk:Chairo (slang)

Original research and reliable sources

@User:PsytranceGuru, Wikipedia is all about what reliable sources say, not what we as individual editors, want. That means no unsourced changes and no original research. Please read the policies: Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:No original research.

The issues with your edits: this edit is particularly problematic. Not only are you violating neutrality (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view), your changes may constitute original research. The changes to definition are not supported by the existing sources. Changes based on your personal "research"/experience are not acceptable- please provide a reliable source for alternative usage.

As for this edit, its inclusion might be notable - if - it received coverage in reliable sources. The problem is with your source- it may not meet reliability due to political slant. (Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources) My personal oppinion is that inlusion of Calderon's, an ex-President, usage is notable. My personal opinion is irrelevant though. A better source is needed. AuroralColibri (talk) 04:51, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@User:AuroralColibri, so where is your reliable source for this statement?: "...is a pejorative epithet used in Mexico to describe an individual who holds a far-left ideology." Also, the news portal Aristegui Noticias, the source I used here, was the recipient of the Knight International Journalism Award by the International Center for Journalists in 2016, so how is this not a reliable source?. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PsytranceGuru (talk • contribs) 21:07, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@User:PsytranceGuru The sources provided in the body text give its definition. WP:LEADCITE, intro doesn't need to be sourced if it is a summary of the sourced body.

From Chilango: "Chairo esa palabra maldita, es actualmente un término utilizado para mofarse de personas con una identidad política de izquierda."

From Milenio: "Es ofensiva para muchos y quien la endilga a otro siente superioridad intelectual respecto de esa persona... y se usa para señalar a personas... que reúnen características y afinidades como una vasta ideología izquierdista–anarquista con componentes hippies y hipsters... ". I tried to keep the translation as Wikipedia:neutral as possible.

The point is, if the Calderon usage is Wikipedia:notable it would have recieved significant coverage. Your source does not support your edit. It is simply a repost of the tweet, nothing else. Your claim of "as a hashtag in twitter to mock current opposition presidential candidate Andrés Manuel López Obrador" is original research. AuroralColibri (talk) 00:32, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SJW

Is there a difference with SJW? JFCochin (talk) 01:53, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.milenio.com/firmas/rogelio_villarreal_2/chairos_18_427337301.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Farfetchd2 (talk) 11:43, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]