Talk:Chain-growth polymerization

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Polymers, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.PolymersWikipedia:WikiProject PolymersTemplate:WikiProject PolymersPolymers articles

Chemistry Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 March 2019 and 5 June 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Zeno0801.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:08, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong

This article needs to be updated. While the historical perspectives of Carothers and Flory is correct, the modern definition of chain-growth versus step-growth is based on molecular weight development during polymerization. This enables a mathematical framework to be broadly applied. An example of where the old definition fails is the thiol–ene polymerization reaction, which proceeds via a free-radical (addition) reaction, but the molecular weight builds geometrically (step-growth). The clear erroneous statement in the article is "unlike condensation polymerization (also known as step-growth polymerization)", which implies they are related and in fact they are two separate concepts.

Initiator

There should be some comment on the fact that initiation can be done not only by heat but also light.

(Edmirsilva (talk) 02:57, 25 September 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Spelling of polymerization

I have no preference with regard to spelling, but it seems odd that the entire article uses the "z" convention (polymerization) but the article title uses the "s" (polymerisation). In fact, the article "Chain-growth polymerization" re-directs to "Chain-growth polymerisation" when it seems like it should be reversed since the article itself uses the opposite convention. Lone Skeptic (talk) 14:06, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]