Talk:Chagpori
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
What's the deal with the spelling?
[edit]It's typically romanized as Chagpori to reflect both spelling (with an extra h) and pronunciation. Where the heck does "Chokpori" come from? I've never seen it before and it doesn't reflect spelling or pronunciation at all. Joechip123 (talk) 06:03, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
Bad info
[edit]I'm correcting some bad info on here. The Mentsikhang was founded in 1916 and was not at the same site as Chagpori. Joechip123 (talk) 06:15, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
Moved to Chagpori
[edit]I've gone ahead and changed the title of the article so it's spelt Chagpori. I've never seen Chokpuri in my life, and that spelling makes no sense whatsoever given both the Wylie transliteration of the word and its pronunciation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joechip123 (talk • contribs) 03:45, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Chagpori. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110828091854/http://www.travelintibet.com:80/tibetan-travel-lhasa.htm to http://travelintibet.com/tibetan-travel-lhasa.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:30, 19 November 2016 (UTC)