Talk:Chae Je-gong

Korea Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Ways to improve Chae Je-gong

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Pldx1, thanks for creating Chae Je-gong!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add your sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 20:44, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear User:Boleyn. Maybe your tags will contribute to the improvement of the Chae Je-gong article. Or maybe not. In any case, you are more than welcome to apply the "sofixit" mantra: don't hesitate to work harder and provide by yourself more facts, more references, more categories and more whatever. You can even remove everything that is not sourced and doesn't belongs to the common knowledge. Happy tagging ! Pldx1 (talk) 22:12, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pldx1, I can't fix every unreferenced article that comes through New Page Patrol, but that doesn't mean I can't help. In this case, I reviewed the article (ticked it off at acceptable for Wikipedia so it can now be indexed by Google) and politely asked you to add your sources. I hoped you would remember where you had got your information from and so it wouldn't be too big an issue for yout oadd it there - I'm happy to add it if you let me know what the source was. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 06:50, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Galactic Patroller. You are describing tagging and thereafter discussing as a 'polite' mode. Perhaps you should consider a 'more polite' mode, i.e. discussing first, and then only tagging if necessary. For your "sofixit" assignment, Google_search(채제공 초상 蔡濟恭肖像) will give you some hints, while Google_search(Chae Jegong – On the Day of the Awakening Insects) will be inspiring. Happy improvements ! Pldx1 (talk) 08:43, 12 April 2018‎

Dear User:Lenticel. Are you really sure that Chae Jegong was actually a member of

-- Joseon Dynasty politicians

-- Joseon Dynasty writers

-- 1799 deaths

-- 1720 births

or have you wrongly trusted an unreferenced Wikipedia stub (already tagged as such by User:Boleyn)? Pldx1 (talk) 14:57, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Pldx you seem to be unclear how New Page Patrol works. NPP reviews all new pages across all topics. It is unreasonable to expect reviewers to fix everything they find wrong for they are likely not even experts on or interested in the random topics they look at. Please provide the requested sources or the page could face deletion. Legacypac (talk) 17:12, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chae Je-gong

The article Chae Je-gong has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources. The creator was asked on talk to provide them but declined.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Legacypac (talk) 17:13, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear User:Legacypac. You were proposing to delete this Chae Je-gong page, instead of applying the wp:SOFIXIT policy, because you are not interested in such a random topic. Despite your personal lack of interest, no less than 27 main space articles are referring to this historical figure! By the way, you should perceive the difference between "the author was politely asked to..." and "the author was templated and summoned to...". The former is largely more efficient than the later. Happy patrolling ! Pldx1 (talk) 08:07, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear User: Serial Number 54129. The page 387 is NOT about Chae Je-gong, and the State Councilors were NOT Ministers ! Pldx1 (talk) 21:50, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Pldx1 please stop harrassing other editors. You posted the page, source it. Legacypac (talk) 21:59, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear User:Pldx1. Please read WP:DGAF. This will explain to you why you shouldn't give a fuck. It will also explain to you why since you clearly don't give a fuck, why should I give a flying fuck. Happy editing! —SerialNumber54129^{paranoia /cheap sh*t room} 09:21, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]