Jump to content

Talk:Chadwell St Mary

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I have deleted the final paragraph which I believe to be amusing nonsense.

Rjm at sleepers 07:37, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The paragraph said:

Many people often talk about the famous Moosepack in Chadwell. It is understood from the Moosepack Bible that there is a connection between the Moosepack and Wickham Park (which is in the North East area of Chadwell-St.-Mary.) However there is no trace of the famous Popeye Village. Maybe one day the legendary lost village of Popeye will be found, and the secrets shared with us all.

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chadwell_St_Mary"


Village or Parish

[edit]

Until the 20th century, Chadwell (St Mary) was a dispersed settlement. I suggest that in discussing its history, it is better to refer to the parish rather than the village.

Rjm at sleepers 09:24, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely not a parish. Thurrock is unparished, and the predecessor Thurrock Urban District consisted of one Thurrock parish rather than being comprised of individual parishes. MRSCTalk 17:53, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chadwell St Mary. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

☒N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:29, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chadwell St Mary. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:37, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]