Jump to content

Talk:Chablis wine

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


merge

[edit]

I do think all AOCs really ought to have their own article with the INAO regulations etc listed, though this is a slightly difficult case. Justinc 11:42, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

About merging: Honestly, I think this whole Chablis article (it's short enough) should be merged with Chardonnay, and the Chablis wine link redirected there. The Chardonnay article wouldn't be hurt by having a section in it devoted to Chablis. Just my opinion. -Amatulic 18:47, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think the merge of Chablis & Chablis AOC is good, however I would be more partial to a name of Chablis (wine) or Chablis (AOC) since the point of the article is more so the wine then the AOC. I don't think we should merge into Chardonnay. There is enough substantial difference in Chablis that would warrant it's own article. In the Chardonnay article there can be a brief paragraph with a See main article: Chablis attached. Agne 16:46, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Upon reflection, I think you're correct about keeping Chablis separate, so I have removed the "merge this article to Chardonnay" tag. I also thind that AOC and wine articles should be merged as a general principle, not just for the specific case of Chablis AOC and Chablis wine. -Amatulic 04:05, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think it makes little sense to have parallel articles called Chablis (wine) and Chablis AOC. If relevant, the AOC designation should be described on the 'wine' page. This issue has also been discussed on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Wine. In my view, we should merge all the AOC (or non-French equivalents) into the corresponding wine article. --Portnadler 17:41, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]


I agree that all of these AOC pages should be merged into Chablis wine. Although, to be perfectly honest, even though I don't have a clue what most of these articles are about, it seems each individual AOC article is sufficiently small enough that they don't warrant their own page. Not to mention each AOC article says pretty much the same thing. Jihiro 03:50, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I think Chablis (wine) and Chablis AOC should be merged and called Chablis (wine). Paul Matthews 11:58, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think we have enough consensus, so I have merged what little content there was in Chablis AOC and redirected it here. When time permits, I will review all the other AOC pages that are duplicates. --Portnadler 12:47, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rewrite

[edit]

I've done a substantial rewrite, and also left merger notes on the other three AOCs not yet merged - it sounds like there's a consensus to do it, but it's only fair to do it by the book. (I support merger of the three other AOCs btw) FlagSteward 22:28, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 03:09, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

The final section of the article is currently poor. Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Trivia sections gives some advice on integrating such content, but not much of what is here is up to that challenge. I feel the "In popular culture" section could be removed without much loss. Charles Matthews (talk) 13:22, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Now done, only the Anna Karenina reference retained. Charles Matthews (talk) 10:23, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Opening line

[edit]

As of writing, the article begins "Chablis (pronounced [ʃabli]) is the northernmost wine district of the Burgundy region in France.". This isn't right, is it? The Jovinien and parts of Tonnerrois are further north. Unless anyone objects, I'm going to correct this to say northenmost AOP, but even that's arguably misleading if you include Appelations Régionale. Porphyro (talk) 20:12, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]