Talk:Ceremonial stone landscape

Indigenous peoples of North America Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archaeology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comment

I'm just learning to create articles on Wikipedia. Help and suggestions are welcome.Geophile 16:30, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ceremonial stone landscape. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927204008/http://www.usetinc.org/index.cfm to http://www.usetinc.org/index.cfm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:27, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New English Review Press

Never heard of it in my life but some book published by them appears to be on this topic. Is the publisher reliable enough for peer-review?

Might purchase the book, in that case. TrangaBellam (talk) 21:40, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@DougWeller: Any idea? TrangaBellam (talk) 15:29, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New English Review so if they published it, no. Note that we have Landscape archaeology. Doug Weller talk 15:56, 19 February 2022 (UTC) @TrangaBellam: pinging you, starting on a 24 hour fast for a colonoscopy (well, that's when it starts, I'll get to eat several hours later!} so I don't know how much I will be editing once the laxatives set it. :)[reply]

But Timothy Ives might have stuff you can use. I see his book is listed at White guilt as that's a or the major topic. Anything NEARA says {see link in section below]] can be ignored. I do have some sympathy with Ives in that for instance America's Stonehenge is 19th/20th century, but the claim there, and for some other stuff in New England, is usually Celts built it. Doug Weller talk 16:42, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also see its description here.[1]. Doug Weller talk 16:43, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - this helps. I will go across the links. And best wishes for the procedure! TrangaBellam (talk) 17:26, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Controversial history

Here is a good write up about the controversy around these structures:[2] It isn’t the best source by itself, but has citations that would be helpful. Thriley (talk) 13:28, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]