Talk:Ceredigion Preseli (UK Parliament constituency)

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Wales Low‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK Parliament constituencies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject UK Parliament constituencies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of UK Parliament constituencies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UK Parliament constituenciesWikipedia:WikiProject UK Parliament constituenciesTemplate:WikiProject UK Parliament constituenciesUK Parliament constituencies articles

first contested

@Sionk: I am aware the campaigns are underway, but the election itself has not happened yet, and campaigns before the election aren’t the actual election. Is there an MP already for Ceredigion Preseli? No. So the contest is yet to take place, merely campaigning now. “First contested” alone gives the impression that is has already been contested in for the first time. It has not.

Compare that to “to be (first) contested” indicates it is to hold its inaugural contest/election on 4th July. Dank Jae 15:35, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The election has not happened, but the contest is already underway. The opening sentence talks about the first contest. Candidates are pounding the streets across the UK at the moment drumming up support on doorsteps. Sionk (talk) 18:16, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sionk, still I’d argue the contest is still actually on 4 July. Campaigns to persuade those to change their vote on 4 July is not part of the actual election. Otherwise should 2024 United Kingdom general election have 30 May 2024–4 July 2024?

Of course after 4 July we can use “first contested” alone. Dank Jae 01:41, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I really can't believe we're arguing about minor semantics when there are far better things to be doing. A contest is different from an election date. Maybe "to be first contested" (like Brecon,_Radnor_and_Cwm_Tawe_(UK_Parliament_constituency)) would cover both of our concerns - it has an element of future tense, while at the same time describing an ongoing general intention (so doesn't require someone to go through re-editing the article in 2 weeks time). Sionk (talk) 08:47, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So the original wording?

Nothing wrong with re-editing the article in less than 2 weeks. It’ll likely happen as people add results. We shouldn’t get ahead of ourselves though by doing edits prematurely.

Only arguing here because I think this was the only article that you decided to change the wording? So confused as to why. Dank Jae 10:30, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]