Talk:Centrifugal-type supercharger
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reads like an advert
[edit]This article reads like a page from an old McCulloch/Paxton supercharger sales folder. The fact that the section offers no drawbacks to centrifugal superchargers should be a red light, especially in the context of applications in automobiles.
Isn't there some Wikipedia rule against things that read like advertisements?Bwob (talk) 16:19, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- There is a Wikipedia article on superchargers. Perhaps this article is redundant.--JHowardGibson (talk) 17:43, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Delete This??
[edit]I have just proposed the deletion of this page on the grounds that the subject is adequately covered elsewhere. I am searching down through the supercharger page and I see that it links here. I will undo my edit. Does this really need to be a separate page? JHowardGibson (talk) 19:39, 13 August 2021 (UTC)