Talk:Centre line (football)

Australia: Australian rules football Low‑importance

	Australia portal Centre line (football) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian rules football (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Move?

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: nomination withdrawn. Clearly the consensus is against me on this one. Jenks24 (talk) 06:27, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Centre line (football) → Centre line –

requesting WP:BRD move. I'm not convinced that "centre line" is ambiguous with "central line" and seeing as it's been at that title with no problems since it was created 2005, I think it should at least go through a full discussion if it is to be moved at all. Jenks24 (talk) 08:32, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
There is an article at the destination that is not a redirect to the current location. By definition, this is a contested move. - UtherSRG (talk) 18:37, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, because it was moved less than 24 hours ago and because I'm not an admin I'm unable to perform a BRD move myself. Jenks24 (talk) 18:49, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
There are many centre lines and center lines and central lines. Page Central line is about a London Underground railway line, just as important as a football term. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:40, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I assume the request is mistaken. It should be a move to Centre line (from where it was moved), not Central line. As per WP:BRD it should be returned. And as there are no other articles entitled Centre line I doubt it needs disambiguating. Tassedethe (talk) 22:25, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Ugh, yes you're correct Tassedethe, I did write "Central line" when I meant "Centre line", and that does explain Anthony's and Uther's confusion. Sorry guys. But now that I've corrected the request, would you or another admin be able to perform a speedy BRD move? Jenks24 (talk) 02:10, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose highly generic, and several things are referred to as the centre line. The 50-yard-line in football (which isn't this one), the red-line in hockey (which isn't this one), the centre line of an airport runway, etc. 70.24.244.198 (talk) 04:01, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong reply. None of the things you mention have articles, except the red line which has a redirect at Red line (hockey) and makes no mention of "centre line". We don't disambiguate for topics which fail to meet Wikipedia's threshold of notability. Jenks24 (talk) 04:19, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - The centre line divides the ice in half lengthwise from the target of the redirect. And I fail to see how it doesn't meet the threshold of notability. The centre line in hockey is at the center of a debate for a rules change currently. Some leagues use it in offsides, some do not. 70.24.244.198 (talk) 07:27, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose clearly not primary. As mentioned above its a highly generic term and I would definitely not give primary topic to any one use. -DJSasso (talk) 11:57, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Not the primary meaning. Centre line should remain a redirect to center line, as it is a common variant spelling of the same topic. Andrewa (talk) 04:14, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Centre line (football). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:35, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Centre line (football). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101228010838/http://www.perthnow.com.au/sport/football-legend-maurice-rioli-dead-from-suspected-heart-attack/story-e6frg1wu-1225976163098 to http://www.perthnow.com.au/sport/football-legend-maurice-rioli-dead-from-suspected-heart-attack/story-e6frg1wu-1225976163098

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:27, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]