Talk:Centre for Defence and International Security Studies
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Centre for Defence and International Security Studies article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was nominated for deletion on June, 8 2014. The result of the discussion was nomination withdrawn. |
I just created a page for the centre of defence and international security studies and linked it in so that people searching for UK think tanks will find it. I strongly disagree that this page comes under the unremarkable people, groups, companies and web content criterion as CDiSS is a major uk think tank that actively advises both governments and companies in a similar way to other major uk think tanks such as RUSI. Munger 85 12:35, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- I can't see how speedy deletion can be suggested here. There's an obvious (and to my mind convincing) claim of notability. I'll removed the tag. JQ 12:43, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- If people follow attribution policy and cite ample independent and reliable sources, there's rarely a problem. Thanks for the info. --ROGER TALK 14:51, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class organization articles
- Unknown-importance organization articles
- WikiProject Organizations articles
- Start-Class military history articles
- Start-Class British military history articles
- British military history task force articles
- Start-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- Start-Class United Kingdom articles
- Unknown-importance United Kingdom articles
- WikiProject United Kingdom articles